Astrologer.
Writer.
Pattern recogniser.

Before astrology, I studied literature. My academic training taught me to pay close attention to structure: why an image returns, how a detail changes meaning because of its position, and what an apparently minor repetition can reveal about the argument holding an entire work together.

I studied English literature at undergraduate level, completed a master's degree in Literature and Modernity, and later undertook doctoral research in English at Royal Holloway, University of London. Astrology eventually gave the same instinct another field to work in.

My interests also extend through music, philosophy, visual culture and esoteric study. Those subjects matter because each offers another place to observe recurrence and another way to test whether a symbolic idea continues to hold when the context changes.

My education in astrology was largely self-directed. I began with my own chart, then moved outward into the charts of people whose lives gave me enough information to compare symbolism with events that had actually happened.

I wanted to understand why the same transit could describe different outcomes, when a natal promise became active, how house rulership changed the meaning of a planet, and which timing techniques remained useful when tested against a real chronology.

That curiosity led me into predictive astrology. Transits, solar returns, annual profections, Zodiacal Releasing, electional astrology and relocation became working methods rather than subjects to memorise.

Over time, the question became less about what one placement means in isolation and more about what happens when several parts of a chart begin describing the same underlying structure.

A single astrological symbol can suggest many things. I am more interested in the moments when several independent factors begin converging on the same subject.

That habit shapes my research outside natal astrology as well. I compare planetary cycles with historical periods, study national charts, and follow recurring configurations across culture and collective life.

When a pattern appears to hold, I keep testing it. When it fails, the failure matters because it tells me where the original idea was too broad, too literal or missing an important condition.

Astrology becomes useful to me when it helps a person see the conditions around a decision more clearly. Description alone is rarely enough. I want to know what is developing, when it becomes more important, and how much room there is to respond.

This is the basis of my private readings. I begin with the parts of the chart carrying the most weight, then follow the timing around them. The final report is written as a connected argument rather than a catalogue of placements.

I do not use astrology to replace a person's judgment. The aim is to make timing, pressure and possibility easier to see so that the person receiving the reading has more context for the choices already in front of them.

The Treasury is my long-form astrology publication. I write forecasts, essays and research on planetary cycles, timing, money, place, culture and collective change.

Some pieces begin with the sky now. Others follow an astrological configuration through decades or centuries. Writing gives me enough room to show how an argument develops and where the evidence becomes convincing.

Private readings bring the same attention to one person's chart, circumstances and timing.